<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One-stop website explains everything you need to know about the new Internet protocol, IPv6</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ipv6actnow.org/2009/05/one-stop-website-explains-everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-new-internet-protocol-ipv6/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ipv6actnow.org/2009/05/one-stop-website-explains-everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-new-internet-protocol-ipv6/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:57:07 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Kisteleki</title>
		<link>http://www.ipv6actnow.org/2009/05/one-stop-website-explains-everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-new-internet-protocol-ipv6/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Kisteleki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 13:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipv6actnow.org/?p=744#comment-25</guid>
		<description>@Clint: IPv4 and IPv6 are not compatible &quot;on the wire&quot;. That means that if one system only speaks IPv4 and the other only IPv6, then they cannot directly talk to each other. You need some kind of translation mechanism between them. There are such solutions, and I&#039;m sure you&#039;ll find useful pointers in the &quot;links&quot; section.

@Damian: Ask your favourite ISP if they have such plans :-) Better yet, demand it from them :-)

Robert</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Clint: IPv4 and IPv6 are not compatible &#8220;on the wire&#8221;. That means that if one system only speaks IPv4 and the other only IPv6, then they cannot directly talk to each other. You need some kind of translation mechanism between them. There are such solutions, and I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll find useful pointers in the &#8220;links&#8221; section.</p>
<p>@Damian: Ask your favourite ISP if they have such plans <img src='http://www.ipv6actnow.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Better yet, demand it from them <img src='http://www.ipv6actnow.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Robert</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damian Duda</title>
		<link>http://www.ipv6actnow.org/2009/05/one-stop-website-explains-everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-new-internet-protocol-ipv6/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Damian Duda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 12:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipv6actnow.org/?p=744#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Is there any migration plan for IPv4 only based network? For now it seems that IPv6 and IPv4 subnetworks are perfectly isolated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any migration plan for IPv4 only based network? For now it seems that IPv6 and IPv4 subnetworks are perfectly isolated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clint Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.ipv6actnow.org/2009/05/one-stop-website-explains-everything-you-need-to-know-about-the-new-internet-protocol-ipv6/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Clint Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 20:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ipv6actnow.org/?p=744#comment-21</guid>
		<description>I understand that the IPv4 addresses are running out, but what I don&#039;t understand is why is it so complex to move for 256.256.256.256 scheme to a
256.256.256.256.256.256.  It appears that you could overlay the new IPv6 over the older IPv4 and just handle via attrition and migration. I know future devices will have to be developed to handle IPv6, but there has to be away to migrate the current IPv4 scheme to IPv6.  Call me an idiot, but
whay am I missing here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand that the IPv4 addresses are running out, but what I don&#8217;t understand is why is it so complex to move for 256.256.256.256 scheme to a<br />
256.256.256.256.256.256.  It appears that you could overlay the new IPv6 over the older IPv4 and just handle via attrition and migration. I know future devices will have to be developed to handle IPv6, but there has to be away to migrate the current IPv4 scheme to IPv6.  Call me an idiot, but<br />
whay am I missing here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

